Emmit Gowins article made a lot of sense to me. It was really interesting how he described the way a lens simply takes a "real" snapshot of life. Along with all the intentions to take a good shot with a camera, life is always displayed "as is". I personally love candid shots and nature with all its wonders. Those types of photos are authentic.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgUsMGp_6FIsbwdDNsjQuItibzF6qIhjTyjUTMy7pmxEC4YptBtzODCjKDWwcNWAbwC6Bs5PBLWlfozKxd6B56VQWqrSB6Wv3JjXxM1CKWQMnbcN1C4Vgv9wD9Ho6yvqEE_bD_37zFBR8F9/s320/gowin+circle+picture.jpg)
I understand an artist's desire to doctor up a photo, but I have to agree with Gowin that the best subjects are just the real thing. The circle camera is actually how a human sees. When one looks straight forward, our peripheral vision fades out and and gets fussy around the outer edges. The circle photo is just that but also a moment in time that can be viewed at a later date.
The weave on the screen was also interesting. It is something he captured with a camera that normally our eyes will faze out of the view. I often watch birds on a feeder out of my dining room window. Every once in a while my eyes will focus on the screen. I wish it wasn't there for a moment and then I will resume focus on the birds.
Very well put reaction. I completely agree with your view on the screen image. It is always something that the human eye looks past. But he was able to capture that image.
ReplyDelete