I enjoyed looking through the work of both of these photographers. Both Adams and Bayles took landscape photos definitely with their own style. Adams took pictures that were of grandeur; whereas, Bayles’ photography was of trees that anyone might see everyday.
By looking at Adams’ photos, one can assume that he had to travel far and hike much to get to some of the locations from which he photographed. Adams was more about taking photos of places that many people won’t ever see. It seemed as though he wanted to get these photos out there to educate people that we have these awesome places that we want to protect. When people saw these photos I’m sure they were awe struck and would do much to help preserve these areas. That was all in Adams’ plan.
When viewing Bayles’ photos for the first time, I was not sure what to make of them. I thought that they were awfully random and not as beautiful as Adams’ landscape photos. However, after taking a second look, I began to realize that he wants us to notice how these random trees can make beautiful photography. He wants us to realize their everyday beauty just as he does.
I also think the trees were meant to bring a sense of calmness and peace especially those that were in the middle of a chaotic city. I thought his portfolio "loggers" had some incredible photos amongst it.
ReplyDelete